'Why I'm happy I gave birth to my rapist's baby' - Brave woman on her unimaginable choice

Joined
Mar 17, 2016
Messages
5,140
Likes
7,639
Points
313
Location
The land of the golden potato
#26
A zygote is not a baby. It's a few cells in the earliest stage of development with the future potential to become a fully realised human being.
The mother is a fully realised human being..

Your assertion that a zygote is (currently) a human being is fallacious. It is just some cells with potential.

If you believe a zygote is a baby then no doubt you also believe other things that consist mostly of future possibilities and probabilities but not current actualities such as , for example that you are currently president if Ireland and human beings have landed on mars. Both are possibilities in the future but not actualities now.

And some with a higher probability than others. :p

The morning after pill after rape should be legally compulsory to deter rapists in a very Darwinian fashion from benefitting in the genetic lottery by a strategy of going around raping women and producing offspring that way like some sort of human cuckoo bird or parasitical wasp.

If you believe otherwise spud then logically, why aren't you out raping gorgeous women you see
then letting the law force them to incubate your evil rapist cuckoo spawn
in order to propagate your genes into the future rather than posting here?
At successful conception, where development has commenced we have a human being. It ain't half a packet of crisps and half human, now that would be fallacious. It's fully human -- that would be accurate if politically/ideologically inconvenient in a world where abortion carnage has been institutionalised and the dehumanisation of babies in the womb is judged a political necessity. So at conception we have offspring and if it's developing and its life is being naturally sustained, it's going to wake up. And this is morally the same as a child, unaware, asleep in the crib who has "potential" as you put it. And I assume there's agreement here we can't kill babies asleep and unaware in the crib whom also have "potential"?

Abortion is unjust on its own terms and as well as it being a weapon which perpetuates the abusers' abuse as he can simply destroy the evidence of his abuse via abortion without burdening himself with consequence of the abuse -- namely a child. Abortion is a weapon to subjugate women and destroy their children and I don't believe it's permissible under any circumstance. (Initiating treatment to save the mother but treatment which results in the death of a child, is not abortion because the intention is to save the mother whereby the death of the child is an incidental consequence of this treatment and not the end-goal of the treatment)

I'll always respect human beings on their own terms and won't disrespect, insult them, make permissable their murder or ostracise them for the crimes of their relatives or some other stigma.

The lady that spoke at the conference, who was the daughter of rape, is a great and pure woman. Of better calibre than most people in this country of that I have no doubt. Go to her face and call her an "evil cuckoo bird" or a "parasitical wasp"(?).
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 16, 2015
Messages
2,249
Likes
1,693
Points
213
Location
Gombeenia
#27
Spoken like a true animal loving Vegan.
When the local tomcat rapist rapes my cat, I'd give her the morning after pill too. :p

a zygote is not a baby. It's a small number of cells with the potential to become a human.
If you think it is an actual human at that point, you're a knee jerk religious zealot.

I'm pretty certain that every day of your life, by a series of lazy life choices you are silently complicit in the systemic mass torture
and exploitation and slaughter of millions of actual living creatures every day merely for corporate profits.

That makes you a hypocrite in your fundamentalist approach to what is and isn't worthy life.

Many of these fully developed animals that are tortured and slaughtered by proxy for your pleasures are valid living entities
far more developed than a cluster of cells.

So, sonny boy, you're not really in a position to judge me ethically regarding my opinion on what a zygote is.

I respect the fundamental desire of actualised animals and humans to carry on living without being tortured, slaughtered, or eaten unnecessarily.
in that sense I am at least somewhat logically consistent in my beliefs. You aren't.
 
Joined
Mar 17, 2016
Messages
5,140
Likes
7,639
Points
313
Location
The land of the golden potato
#28
When the local tomcat rapist rapes my cat, I'd give her the morning after pill too. :p

a zygote is not a baby. It's a small number of cells with the potential to become a human.
If you think it is an actual human at that point, you're a knee jerk religious zealot.

I'm pretty certain that every day of your life, by a series of lazy life choices you are silently complicit in the systemic mass torture
and exploitation and slaughter of millions of actual living creatures every day merely for corporate profits.

That makes you a hypocrite in your fundamentalist approach to what is and isn't worthy life.

Many of these fully developed animals that are tortured and slaughtered by proxy for your pleasures are valid living entities
far more developed than a cluster of cells.

So, sonny boy, you're not really in a position to judge me ethically regarding my opinion on what a zygote is.

I respect the fundamental desire of actualised animals and humans to carry on living without being tortured, slaughtered, or eaten unnecessarily.
in that sense I am at least somewhat logically consistent in my beliefs. You aren't.
At conception and commencement of development you have a child, essentially.

Animal smooching whilst thinking infanticide is permissible for the acts of a third party are definitely sentiments of a very radical misanthropy.
 

Tadhg Gaelach

Donator
Premium Account
Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2016
Messages
26,197
Likes
23,751
Points
313
#29
A zygote is not a baby. It's a few cells in the earliest stage of development with the future potential to become a fully realised human being.
The mother is a fully realised human being..

Your assertion that a zygote is (currently) a human being is fallacious. It is just some cells with potential.
You are ignoring the whole science of biology - and replacing it with some kind of pseudo-philosophy. We don't get "some cells" with potential to become members of a particular species. Either they already are a member of that species - or they never will be.
 

Tadhg Gaelach

Donator
Premium Account
Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2016
Messages
26,197
Likes
23,751
Points
313
#31
I respect the fundamental desire of actualised animals and humans to carry on living without being tortured, slaughtered, or eaten unnecessarily.
The problem here is that your moment of actualization must be arbitrary. One person may say that moment is 20 weeks in the womb, another that its the moment of birth, another - like the Jews - three weeks after birth, another that it never happens for handicapped people, etc. etc. etc.
 
Joined
Nov 16, 2015
Messages
2,249
Likes
1,693
Points
213
Location
Gombeenia
#32
At successful conception, where development has commenced we have a human being. It ain't half a packet of crisps and half human, now that would be fallacious. It's fully human -- that would be accurate if politically/ideologically inconvenient in a world where abortion carnage has been institutionalised and the dehumanisation of babies in the womb is judged a political necessity. So at conception we have offspring and if it's developing and its life is being naturally sustained, it's going to wake up. And this is morally the same as a child, unaware, asleep in the crib who has "potential" as you put it. And I assume there's agreement here we can't kill babies asleep and unaware in the crib whom also have "potential"?

Abortion is unjust on its own terms and as well as it being a weapon which perpetuates the abusers' abuse as he can simply destroy the evidence of his abuse via abortion without burdening himself with consequence of the abuse -- namely a child. Abortion is a weapon to subjugate women and destroy their children and I don't believe it's permissible under any circumstance. (Initiating treatment to save the mother but treatment which results in the death of a child, is not abortion because the intention is to save the mother whereby the death of the child is an incidental consequence of this treatment and not the end-goal of the treatment)

I'll always respect human beings on their own terms and won't disrespect, insult them, make permissable their murder or ostracise them for the crimes of their relatives or some other stigma.

The lady that spoke at the conference, who was the daughter of rape, is a great and pure woman. Of better calibre than most people in this country of that I have no doubt. Go to her face and call her an "evil cuckoo bird" or a "parasitical wasp"(?).
Dumbass. You don't even seem to understand the posts you reply to!

The cuckoo bird and the parasitical wasp is the actual rapist himself,
not the unfortunate victim he foists his evil sociopath sperm on
nor his offspring.

But it IS fair to say that that woman does carry the genes of a rapist into the future and
is a very real living reward for his crime. And it certainly sends the wrong Darwinian signal to rapists,
i.e. that they can take a shortcut to win the genetic lottery by a strategy of raping women and having them reduced to involuntary brood mares for their offspring. That is why I would advocate the morning after pill being compulsory for rape victims.
because violent crimes against other human beings should not be rewarded. You obviously must think they should be rewarded.

If you won't take the time to read and comprehend my posts before responding claiming I am saying stuff I didn't actually say or imply
then how can you reasonably expect other people to bother taking the time to read and understand your posts?

Address the actual points made not shit strawmen you made up.
 
OP
OP
Ire-land

Ire-land

Donator
Premium Account
Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2017
Messages
3,389
Likes
4,557
Points
263
Location
Dublin
#33
When the local tomcat rapist rapes my cat, I'd give her the morning after pill too. :p

a zygote is not a baby. It's a small number of cells with the potential to become a human.
If you think it is an actual human at that point, you're a knee jerk religious zealot.

I'm pretty certain that every day of your life, by a series of lazy life choices you are silently complicit in the systemic mass torture
and exploitation and slaughter of millions of actual living creatures every day merely for corporate profits.

That makes you a hypocrite in your fundamentalist approach to what is and isn't worthy life.

Many of these fully developed animals that are tortured and slaughtered by proxy for your pleasures are valid living entities
far more developed than a cluster of cells.

So, sonny boy, you're not really in a position to judge me ethically regarding my opinion on what a zygote is.

I respect the fundamental desire of actualised animals and humans to carry on living without being tortured, slaughtered, or eaten unnecessarily.
in that sense I am at least somewhat logically consistent in my beliefs. You aren't.
No, the difference between me and you, is that I respect all life, and I’m fully aware of my impact on them, both negative and positive. You have this oddly contrived version of what’s valuable that conveniently fits with what you value. As they say, you know you’ve created god in your own image when he hates all the things that you hate. Or in this case, what he values.

And Sonny boy? My god...
 
Joined
Nov 16, 2015
Messages
2,249
Likes
1,693
Points
213
Location
Gombeenia
#34
The problem here is that your moment of actualization must be arbitrary. One person may say that moment is 20 weeks in the womb, another that its the moment of birth, another - like the Jews - three weeks after birth, another that it never happens for handicapped people, etc. etc. etc.
In the case of rapists, I am talking about the morning after pill. Not abortion after 20 weeks which I am not in favour of.
You can't compare being forced to take the morning after pill after rape to a girl being 20 weeks pregnant and deciding to have an abortion.
Huge difference.

If a woman is raped then leaves it for 20 weeks before getting an abortion then she is an idiot,
and her position is very hard to justify ethically IMHO.

By making the MOP compulsory after rape then all grey areas are removed from the equation
after a rape. There will be no 20 week rapist baby abortions if it is the law and is compulsorily carried out by the doctor examining.

This thread is about the aftermath of rape not abortion per se. I am offering my simple logical solution to this narrow issue.

There are other threads dealing with the act of abortion itself. Please leave the issue of outlier cases of 20 week abortions to those.
 
Joined
Nov 16, 2015
Messages
2,249
Likes
1,693
Points
213
Location
Gombeenia
#35
No, the difference between me and you, is that I respect all life, and I’m fully aware of my impact on them, both negative and positive. You have this oddly contrived version of what’s valuable that conveniently fits with what you value. As they say, you know you’ve created god in your own image when he hates all the things that you hate. Or in this case, what he values.

And Sonny boy? My god...
No you don't you faker. What did you have for dinner?

The difference between us "sonny boy" is that I am more consistent in my respect for actual living beings, both human and non human, than you are. I believe in not torturing or killing living beings unnecessarily nor getting proxies to torture and kill them for me.

You however believe in allowing this to be done in your name by proxy when it suits you then at the other extreme, in zooming in and getting on your high horse over a fucking clump of cells.

I am not the odd one here. Your cognitive dissonance and your insistence on defending the indefensible in the face of the hard evidence is what is really odd here.

Much easier to diss the "wierdo" than to take a hard look
at your own contradictory value system though isn't it?
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom