We Never Went To The Moon

valamhic

PI Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2019
Messages
984
Likes
367
The NASA crowd are co operating with China, they probably asked them to go to the dark side in case they would go to the bright side and prove there was no evidence of Apollo. NASA will try to get back to cover their tracks ASAP
 

patrick jane

Donator
PI Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2018
Messages
1,827
Likes
231
Location
USA
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #290
NO EXPERIMENT CAN DETECT EARTH'S MOTION - Part 1


14 minutes









NO EXPERIMENT CAN DETECT EARTH'S MOTION - Part 2


23 minutes - watch the whole thing !!!








NO EXPERIMENT CAN DETECT EARTH'S MOTION - Part 3


6 minutes





No experiment has ever been performed with such excruciating persistence and meticulous precision, and in every conceivable manner, than that of trying to detect and measure the motion of the Earth. Yet they have all consistently and continually yielded a velocity for the Earth of exactly ZERO mph.


The toil of thousands of exasperated researchers, in the extremely varied experiments of Arago, De Coudre's induction, Fizeau, Fresnell drag, Hoek, Jaseja's lasers, Jenkins, Klinkerfuess, Michelson-Morley interferometry, Lord Rayleigh's polarimetry, Troughton-Noble torque, and the famous 'Airy's Failure' experiment, all conclusively failed to show any rotational or translational movement for the earth, whatsoever."


"They want you to believe that the Moon's rotation is perfectly synchronized with its orbit so that's why we only ever see one side of the Moon, rather than conclude the obvious - that the Moon is simply NOT rotating. Moreover, they had to slow down the Moon's speed by 58,870 mph AND reverse its direction to West-East to successfully sell their phony heliocentricity system to a gullible public.


I don't think there is one person in many, many thousands - regardless of education - who knows that the Copernican Model had to turn the Moon's observable direction around and give it a new speed to accommodate the phases and eclipses." -Marshall Hall


Of course, Airy's water-filled instrument did not deliver the desired proof of the Copernican paradigm. Agreeing with somewhat similar tests already performed by Hoek and Klinkerfusz, the experiment demonstrated exactly the opposite outcome of that which had to be confidently expected.


Actually the most careful measurements gave the same angle of aberration for a telescope with water as for one filled with air. Airy put water in the telescope to test Bradley's claim that the moving Earth caused aberration; he saw no change in aberration angle with the water added.


This was termed a ‘failure’, since Bradley’s theory of receiver motion predicted a change with the index of refraction – n. CONCLUSION: The deflection of starlight known as stellar aberration is NOT due to the Earth’s motion, but is an external bending of light before reaching the telescope.
 

valamhic

PI Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2019
Messages
984
Likes
367
Check out this film from Apollo 12. Go to minute 12.36 and see the shadows from a single light source, the sun.


Its impossible
 

valamhic

PI Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2019
Messages
984
Likes
367
NO EXPERIMENT CAN DETECT EARTH'S MOTION - Part 1


14 minutes









NO EXPERIMENT CAN DETECT EARTH'S MOTION - Part 2


23 minutes - watch the whole thing !!!








NO EXPERIMENT CAN DETECT EARTH'S MOTION - Part 3


6 minutes





No experiment has ever been performed with such excruciating persistence and meticulous precision, and in every conceivable manner, than that of trying to detect and measure the motion of the Earth. Yet they have all consistently and continually yielded a velocity for the Earth of exactly ZERO mph.


The toil of thousands of exasperated researchers, in the extremely varied experiments of Arago, De Coudre's induction, Fizeau, Fresnell drag, Hoek, Jaseja's lasers, Jenkins, Klinkerfuess, Michelson-Morley interferometry, Lord Rayleigh's polarimetry, Troughton-Noble torque, and the famous 'Airy's Failure' experiment, all conclusively failed to show any rotational or translational movement for the earth, whatsoever."


"They want you to believe that the Moon's rotation is perfectly synchronized with its orbit so that's why we only ever see one side of the Moon, rather than conclude the obvious - that the Moon is simply NOT rotating. Moreover, they had to slow down the Moon's speed by 58,870 mph AND reverse its direction to West-East to successfully sell their phony heliocentricity system to a gullible public.


I don't think there is one person in many, many thousands - regardless of education - who knows that the Copernican Model had to turn the Moon's observable direction around and give it a new speed to accommodate the phases and eclipses." -Marshall Hall


Of course, Airy's water-filled instrument did not deliver the desired proof of the Copernican paradigm. Agreeing with somewhat similar tests already performed by Hoek and Klinkerfusz, the experiment demonstrated exactly the opposite outcome of that which had to be confidently expected.


Actually the most careful measurements gave the same angle of aberration for a telescope with water as for one filled with air. Airy put water in the telescope to test Bradley's claim that the moving Earth caused aberration; he saw no change in aberration angle with the water added.


This was termed a ‘failure’, since Bradley’s theory of receiver motion predicted a change with the index of refraction – n. CONCLUSION: The deflection of starlight known as stellar aberration is NOT due to the Earth’s motion, but is an external bending of light before reaching the telescope.
The earth's spin can be directly observed on any clear night. The earths orbit round the sun can be observed by the seasons.
 

valamhic

PI Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2019
Messages
984
Likes
367
I have been neutral on the issue for many years, but the Chinese unmanned mission this year was a ground breaker. It shows the moon as having a red tinge. Its only the dust, not the rocks. The lefties claim this is a colour adjustment problem with the camera. There is too much red in it.

So the story is in 2019, when the Chinese make most phone cameras which take billions of good quality photos per year. These same chinese can't take a colour photo on the moon? Ha?
 

patrick jane

Donator
PI Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2018
Messages
1,827
Likes
231
Location
USA
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #294
Antarctic Ice Wall Footage - Encircling The Earth


4 minutes

 

patrick jane

Donator
PI Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2018
Messages
1,827
Likes
231
Location
USA
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #295
Flat Earth 186 MILES High - Footage

Watch Closely - 186 x 5,000? How many feet high? Flat and Level !!!

2 minutes

 

valamhic

PI Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2019
Messages
984
Likes
367
Its most likely that they put the astronauts into low earth orbit and filmed the rest at home. Apollo 13 was just to draw attention.
 

shinshin

PI Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2018
Messages
176
Likes
181
It appears that the moon is within earths atmosphereo_O.
Which means that much of what we thought is rubbish!
Where is the Van Allen Belt?
How did we get to the moon?
 

valamhic

PI Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2019
Messages
984
Likes
367
It appears that the moon is within earths atmosphereo_O.
Which means that much of what we thought is rubbish!
Where is the Van Allen Belt?
How did we get to the moon?
“On Earth we would call it vacuum, so this extra source of hydrogen is not significant enough to facilitate space exploration,” adds Baliukin. He also believes these particles won’t pose any threat to astronauts who go exploring the moon again.
 

patrick jane

Donator
PI Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2018
Messages
1,827
Likes
231
Location
USA
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #300
Ethereal | UAP - Debunking NetFlix: Behind The Curve

I haven’t worked on a video for this long before. This is to support Globebusters Bob and Jeran against a hit piece called “Behind the Curve”. It’s the “Netflix and Shill” mockumentary that mocks Flat Earth. I’ve made a little mockumentary of my own. Now, I poke some fun at my fellow Flearthers, but that’s because I love ‘em.

Mostly, I’m going to illustrate how it works when MSM 🍯 us. They’re basically just using the subject as an excuse to profit off the very interesting ideas that come out from independent thinkers like Bob and Jeran. At the end of the day, they may have proven how desperate the globalists are to quash the Flat Earth movement, that, nonetheless, is advancing through time, and cutting right into fake space.


What we’re finding, some people just don’t understand. But it all gets explained in the end.


52 minutes

 
Top Bottom