The earth's spin can be directly observed on any clear night. The earths orbit round the sun can be observed by the seasons.NO EXPERIMENT CAN DETECT EARTH'S MOTION - Part 1
NO EXPERIMENT CAN DETECT EARTH'S MOTION - Part 2
23 minutes - watch the whole thing !!!
NO EXPERIMENT CAN DETECT EARTH'S MOTION - Part 3
No experiment has ever been performed with such excruciating persistence and meticulous precision, and in every conceivable manner, than that of trying to detect and measure the motion of the Earth. Yet they have all consistently and continually yielded a velocity for the Earth of exactly ZERO mph.
The toil of thousands of exasperated researchers, in the extremely varied experiments of Arago, De Coudre's induction, Fizeau, Fresnell drag, Hoek, Jaseja's lasers, Jenkins, Klinkerfuess, Michelson-Morley interferometry, Lord Rayleigh's polarimetry, Troughton-Noble torque, and the famous 'Airy's Failure' experiment, all conclusively failed to show any rotational or translational movement for the earth, whatsoever."
"They want you to believe that the Moon's rotation is perfectly synchronized with its orbit so that's why we only ever see one side of the Moon, rather than conclude the obvious - that the Moon is simply NOT rotating. Moreover, they had to slow down the Moon's speed by 58,870 mph AND reverse its direction to West-East to successfully sell their phony heliocentricity system to a gullible public.
I don't think there is one person in many, many thousands - regardless of education - who knows that the Copernican Model had to turn the Moon's observable direction around and give it a new speed to accommodate the phases and eclipses." -Marshall Hall
Of course, Airy's water-filled instrument did not deliver the desired proof of the Copernican paradigm. Agreeing with somewhat similar tests already performed by Hoek and Klinkerfusz, the experiment demonstrated exactly the opposite outcome of that which had to be confidently expected.
Actually the most careful measurements gave the same angle of aberration for a telescope with water as for one filled with air. Airy put water in the telescope to test Bradley's claim that the moving Earth caused aberration; he saw no change in aberration angle with the water added.
This was termed a ‘failure’, since Bradley’s theory of receiver motion predicted a change with the index of refraction – n. CONCLUSION: The deflection of starlight known as stellar aberration is NOT due to the Earth’s motion, but is an external bending of light before reaching the telescope.
“On Earth we would call it vacuum, so this extra source of hydrogen is not significant enough to facilitate space exploration,” adds Baliukin. He also believes these particles won’t pose any threat to astronauts who go exploring the moon again.It appears that the moon is within earths atmosphere.
Which means that much of what we thought is rubbish!
Where is the Van Allen Belt?
How did we get to the moon?
The Earth’s atmosphere is much bigger than previously thought, extending far beyond the Moon, a team of scientists have revealed. The amazing discovery was made thanks to data that has been sitting unexamined for over 20 years.www.rt.com