Political Irish | The Irish Politics & Current Affairs Website

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Before posting anything about the COVID-19 virus, please read this first Click Here

The Kalergi Plan : The agenda to genocide people of European heritage.

This thread is a first attempt to learn the basics of how self moderated threads work. The hope being to increase focus on matters of importance by being able to prune out comments which detract from intelligent debate and make threads more time consuming to read than is necessary. Below is a sample from a medium length article that deals with the Kalergi Plan mass immigration agenda, it's well written and informative. If you've not read it before it's well worth it.

The image link below shows a picture and quote of Jean Monnet, founding father of the EU, saying "Europe's nations should be guided towards the superstate without their people understanding what is happening." I can't get it to show on this page (my Techlexia wins again for now) but it's in the article at the bottom of this post anyway.

In the 1920s, Free Mason Count Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi wrote a book titled “Praktischer Idealismus,” (Practical Idealism) which set out his views on how he believed the abolition of the right of self-determination and the elimination of European nations should be accomplished with the formation of an European Union.

Kalergi in his own words: “The (European) man of the future will be of mixed race. Today’s races and classes will disappear owing to the disappearing of space (nations), time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-black race of the future, similar in its outward appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals”

This, Kalergi stated, should be a plan run for and by the racial and spiritual supremacy of ‘blood aristocracy and Jewry’. These are all his crude racialist words, not mine. People should be free to mix and settle with a partner from whatever race or ethnicity they choose. But what Kalergi and the Pan European plan specifically calls out for is the deliberate use of enforced and disproportionate mass immigration, especially from non-European countries, in order to bring in a Pan European single state dictatorship and destroy the indigenous pink/white nationalities, and therefore resistance, of Europe.

 

The Field Marshal

PI Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2018
Messages
11,578
Likes
9,047
It's not really your view though, it's the view of the scam artists behind the 9/11 Commission Report. A report which claims the impossible. Those lies were used to justify the very unChristian suffering of many innocents and to this day is the event driving war, mass immigration, the reduction of Christianity and the emergence of a Totalitarian World Order.

You know.. the kind of world order that the occult Satanic elite's have been dreaming of since way back.

You must be really keen to see an End Times scenario because God doesn't plant nanothermite in skyscrapers.
Are you really going to pursue this 9/11 controversy?
I have given my views several times.

You have now transformed a terrorist attack into an End Times casus belli.
I disagree with that.

As for God, neither you or I have the first or even vaguest notion of what God can do or not do.
 
OP
bAd

bAd

Moderator
PI Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2020
Messages
859
Likes
1,138
Are you really going to pursue this 9/11 controversy?
I have given my views several times.

Yes, considering the number of people claiming faith in Jesus but not lifting a finger to acknowledge scientifically verifiable truth to help end the unnecessary suffering of innocents, I expect I'll be pursuing such contraversy.

You have now transformed a terrorist attack into an End Times casus belli.
I disagree with that.

Casus belli : "an act or event that provokes or is used to justify war"

Not a terrorist attack, an inside job terrorist attack, portrayed by the mainstream media as an outside job terrorist attack to justify a so-called War on Terror. A hidden truth that led to the so-called Patriot Act and is being used to usher in an infernal Totalitarian World Order. One which is in the final stages of the process of ending the God given freedoms of all humanity.

As for God, neither you or I have the first or even vaguest notion of what God can do or not do.

Given that you can't even acknowledge scientific fact to save your soul, there's little point theorizing with you about matters that are naturally vague.
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2017
Messages
3,537
Likes
5,221
...
Zangwill was probably a key influence on Count Richard Nikolaus Eijiro von Coudenhove-Kalergi (1894–1972), the cosmopolitan geopolitician and philosopher whose name has become synonymous with the worst of the European Union project. Kalergi was himself the product of miscegenation, having an Austro-Hungarian father and a Japanese mother, and he spent much of his life producing a blend of pacifist and European integrationist literature. Ellis carefully contextualises Kalergi, once described by Hitler as a “cosmopolitan bastard,” over the course of some 25 pages, and examines his thought in detail. There were some novel revelations for me, including his self-conscious participation in Freemasonry, his quite extensive reliance upon Jewish finance, and his extremely strange and dangerous fantasy that Jews were the ideal leaders of the future European state. That being said, Ellis provides enough information on Kalergi’s thought to cast doubt on the existence of a clearly-defined “Kalergi Plan.” Much of Kalergi’s work promoted European unity under three banners—peace, civilization (including renewed European colonization of Africa), and trade. Kalergi believed that Europeans shared a common cultural destiny and that Europe should be a world power on the same level as the United States and the Soviet Union. And while he eulogized the notion that the European man of the future would be of mixed race, he does not appear anywhere to have actively promoted immigration to Europe and in fact wrote: “Europe must at all costs prevent that great number of black workers and soldiers from immigrating to Europe.” Ellis comments that although Kalergi was wrong to reduce European identity to a matter of “morals and of style,” he “did not intend for large-scale immigration into Europe from non-European peoples, especially from Africa and the Muslim Middle-East.”

As in the Union of Democratic Control, which housed different goals, interests and ideological trajectories, Kalergi emerges from Ellis’s account as an ideologically and racially confused individual, in possession of eccentric, irrational, and often contradictory theories, and acting often at the hands of much more powerful forces with ulterior motives. By far the strangest of Kalergi’s theories was the idea that the new united Europe should be governed by a “spiritual aristocratic leadership” that “can only be found in the Jewish people.” These traits, according to Kalergi, “predestine Jews to be leaders of urban humanity, the protagonists of capitalism as well as the revolution.” As Ellis puts it:
It would not be the European aristocrats that would lead the new Europe to unification and finally world federation; rather it would be the interplay of the leaders of both Jewish capitalism and Jewish socialism alone who would take over and dominate the forces of European power and determine its destiny.
That Kalergi was probably directly influenced by the work of Zangwill in this regard is almost beyond doubt, and Jewish influence here is compounded by the fact Kalergi was funded by his friend Louis Nathaniel de Rothschild, and the Jewish bankers Max Warburg, Felix Warburg, Paul Warburg, and Bernard Baruch. As well as receiving financial backing, Kalergi was in “constant intellectual dialogue” with Max Warburg, who may have shaped some of Kalergi’s ideas on putative Jewish supremacy. Ellis points out that after World War II, when the first steps towards a unified European bureaucratic structure were being taken, some scholars have argued that “the Pan European Movement and Union were appropriated by people who wished to use it for their own ends.”

These “people,” essentially technocrats, politicians and lawyers, are situated by Ellis within the Fabian Society and the Frankfurt School. The Fabian Society, which aimed for a slow and steady socialist revolution in society, is explained as more or less a club of well-intention British utopian socialist eccentrics until it merged in the 1920s with Rothschild finance and received the generous backing of British Jewish banker Sir Ernest Cassel; it also enjoyed the backing of the Rockefeller Foundation and J.P. Morgan. All were involved in the founding of the London School of Economics (LSE) which was intended to train up activists, bureaucrats, politicians for the revolution. Ellis comments:
So here we have a socialist-capitalist alliance whereby Big Business elites utilise socialist institutions to nurture their own aims. This obviously begs a particular question: Why do major capitalists and international finance organizations want to train the bureaucracy for the creation of a future socialist state? Isn’t socialism, in its very essence, antithetical to capitalism? H.G. Wells explained this apparent paradox in 1920: “Big Business is in no means antipathetic to Communism. The larger big business grows the more it approximates Collectivism. It is the upper road of the few instead of the lower road of the masses to Collectivism.”
Ellis adds that it became the strategy of Fabian socialism to “prefer wealthy elites (intellectual, political, economic) rather than the proletariat (working class) as the source of revolutionary potential.” By 1945, the Fabian Society had taken over the British House of Commons, since more than half of the ruling Labour party’s MPs were paid-up Fabians. The same trends are prominent today, most notably in the example of the Fabian Tony Blair, whose Labour Party during his decade of power (1997–2007) ushered in the biggest ever acceleration of immigration to Britain, and who maintains strong links to Jewish international finance in the form of his close friend and ally Moshe Kantor.

Ellis has a very interesting section demonstrating organic links between the Fabian Society and the Frankfurt School, especially in their early stages, and cross-pollination of ideas between British and German socialists. There are clear parallels in the way both groupings set about their destructive tasks with the tactic of gradual infiltration. Permeation, or “honeycombing,” of existing institutions with committed activists and intellectuals was the preferred methodology of bringing about large-scale societal change, and both groupings eschewed the notion of the working class as a viable source for revolutionary socialism. Ellis lists the “products” of Fabian and Frankfurt School activism as:
feminism; affirmative action; deconstruction; the transformation of the traditional family, church, education, and morals; Third-World opposition movements; anti-nationalism; cultural contempt; anti-discrimination; liberal immigration reforms; ‘White Privilege;’ White Guilt; “Diversity is Strength”; ‘tolerance’; Political Correctness; and multiculturalism.
The dramatic changes witnessed in Western society over the last 70 years have been, argues Ellis, wrought by the activity of a “New Class” composed of university-educated, liberal, cosmopolitans who have gained support from financial elites, thus increasing their social capital and expanding their capacity for political action. Both Fabianism and the Frankfurt School are
elite forms of socialism, whether in intellectual political, cultural, or economic terms, as they no longer focus on the working classes. They are bourgeois revolutionary theories that instigate revolutions from above, not below; they are not grassroots or democratic; they are plutocratic, oligarchic, and dictatorial. These socialist intellectuals ‘march through the institutions’ to effect a ‘gradual’ revolution from above and are sponsored by the capitalist forces they supposedly oppose.
...
Ellis’s analysis of the mental health of the average member of the cosmopolitan elite is excellent. Her assertion that they “have a combined sense of intellectual superiority, moral arrogance, and existential insecurity, often involving fear of ‘natural groups,’” couldn’t be more aptly applied to Jewish activists. One is also reminded of the infamous 2010 confrontation between the Fabian British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and Gillian Duffy, one of his own voters. Duffy had mentioned a lack of jobs in the context of ongoing mass immigration, prompting Brown to quickly abandon the exchange and get into a departing car. Unaware that his microphone was still on, a horrified Brown was recorded by the media talking to his aides: “That was a disaster—they should never have put me with that woman. Whose idea was that? Ridiculous!” Asked what she had said, he replied: “Everything, she was just a bigoted woman.” The cosmopolitan elite in a nutshell — fleeing from reality and full of moral and dehumanizing condemnations of those members of the “natural group” who dissent.
...
Kalergi is a bit of a distraction considering how many lunatics we have running around out there now pushing immigration and the destruction of borders. His views were all over the place at times stating he did not want Europe to be swamped by third worlders. He wanted a unified Europe that could stand on its own at the world stage.

Generations of elites have been programmed into believing that the west needs to be flooded is the primary issue. There are lots of weights that have gotten us to where we are, and people are taking advantage of such. These filth wouldn't be able to do as such if western people were in a healthy state. The plan is for nations to be in name only and an unelected elite, 'New Class' running everything. . Your elites are garbage.

...
“The key to WEF thinking — that is the not-so-secret agenda of the organization — is that globalization requires corresponding ‘global governance.’ WEF founder and president Klaus Schwab wrote in the organization’s 1998 annual report that the Asian (financial) crisis (in 1997) had ‘brought every salient question to the fore. How are we going to govern globalization? This will be a top collective priority … (in) the 21stcentury.'”

The WEF says of its 2021 meeting: “The COVID-19 crisis, and the political, economic and social disruptions it has caused, is fundamentally changing the traditional context for decision-making … As we enter a unique window of opportunity to shape the recovery, this initiative will offer insights to help inform all those determining the future state of global relations, the direction of national economies, the priorities of societies, the nature of business models and the management of a global commons.”

The mirrors what Trudeau said in September to another organization that believes in global governance, the United Nations, whose Agenda 2030 is similar to The Great Reset.

Trudeau said: “This pandemic has provided an opportunity for a reset. This is our chance to accelerate our pre-pandemic efforts to reimagine economic systems that actually address global challenges like extreme poverty, inequality and climate change.”

Trudeau has made other comments consistent with the globalist perspective of the WEF, telling the New York Timesafter becoming PM in 2015, that Canada is the world’s “first post-national state” where “there is no core identity, no mainstream.”

There is, of course, an opposing view, which is that nations should not sacrifice their sovereignty to global bodies, as has happened with climate change with regard to Canada’s energy policy, and that capitalism, while imperfect, is superior to communism.

The potential danger of the “Davos Men” as the late American political scientist Samuel P. Huntington described them, is that in arguing “the moral superiority of identifying with humanity at large,” they “abandon their commitment to the nation, and their fellow citizens.”
...
Klaus talks about the Asian financial crisis and how the fix for it is global governance. And yet George Soros and friends made sure there was a crisis Here's how George Soros broke the Bank of Thailand, funny stuff.

Take advantage of a crisis, even create one out of something that otherwise would not have been considered a crisis, and push their solutions.
 
OP
bAd

bAd

Moderator
PI Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2020
Messages
859
Likes
1,138
It seems that the future of the world is being manipulated by a group of Bond villains.

Might be a tad amusing if it wasn’t true.
It might be even more than just a tad amusing if their so-called 'Great Reset' meant the end of their own infernal sociological scam.
 

page61

PI Member
Joined
May 25, 2018
Messages
5,564
Likes
5,093
It might be even more than just a tad amusing if their so-called 'Great Reset' meant the end of their own infernal sociological scam.

Out of curiosity


Do you think 911 was an inside job?
who do you think killed kennedy?
Do you think we landed on the moon ?
Do you believe in the NWO and their plan?
Was the Titanic sunk or was it its sister ship ?
 
Top Bottom