- May 31, 2019
A worthy addition to the canon: The Real War on Science
Liberal bias in science
Posting this here, first 20 minutes is all needed but good video overall.
The push for carbon taxes is a politically motivated not scientifically motivated and we are seeing this heavily come to the fore now in even our own politics.
The politicising of findings to push certain agendas. Obviously we contribute to changes in climate just like termites do
Termites have high biomass in many tropical ecosystems and emit the greenhouse gases CO2 and CH4. They are also recognized as ecosystem engineers, mediating decomposition and other aspects of soil...link.springer.com
so yes there is AGW, if we eat lots of beef, we are producing lots of cows and so methane as example
India has the largest cattle inventory in the world in 2018 followed by Brazil & China.beef2live.com
but of course india is the worst culprit here even though they dont eat beef they have a third of the worlds cows
but there are many factors that contribute to changes in the climate cycle, one which has always changed and would always change no matter if we were on this planet or not, the primary one being the sun above all else.
But the scientists have strayed so far from the data, eg the hockey stick graph which was completely fake due to an algorithm that generated a pre cooked result based on selectively amplifying certain trends that went in the direction they wanted it to go, revealed on different occasions like with the climate gate emails.
Our hopelessly compromised scientific establishment cannot be allowed to get away with the Climategate whitewash regarding statistics for global warming, says Christopher Bookerwww.telegraph.co.uk
As in people changing the data to get the policy change they want for whatever liberal political reasons they are promoting. And if you think that the earth would not be in a warming period that it is now, even if we were all long dead at this point, you are not at the races.
The same issues abound in the social sciences
Where his fake science was promoted as it was exactly what certain people wanted to hear to promote regulations or ideas that aligned with their political and ideological views.
Such junk science like above is being funded in the end by the tax payer, its all about the money flowing in the end.
This does not mean that co2 hasnt effects, it does, it is plant food, ye want lots of trees , lots of co2 is good for that.
We may be fucking up the place, we are at least regards pollution, but its irrelevant if you think the clowns that are running things are using such thoughts for the benefit of anyone other then themselves. If you cannot disconnect actions from what is happening, as in you buy into the religion of climate change that is being pushed now, you have acclimatised yourself to the clown world we are in today.
If you care about nature then there lots of parts to target Where have all the swallows gone?
So why arent we invading egypt ?
Lets assume that co2 is the issue. China is the biggest polluter across the board and has the highest co2 output of any country by double at the very least, so why havent we glassed the place, its not going to stop and is laughing at us, though it is doing what i have said you should do and that is build on from the technology that we have, rather then add on technology that is obviously not going o work in the end as it still depends on the old technology to be around, and so is just adding to the complexity of the system.
Anything this country does regards what they tell us to is not only going to be an extra tax on us, its not going to do anything in the end as all its about is pushing the industrial jobs onto poorer countries and taxes and higher bills on the plebs, the clowns in this country think they can change the world, fuck is wrong with us, we are irrelevant outside being used as a caymon islands of europe or for the deportation of our own and importation of their replacements. We were one of two that declared a climate change disaster is happening, we are a laughing stock, no different to leprechaun economics.
Consensus means little in science when science is influenced heavily by the social order and where your money comes from.
"In the sciences, the authority of thousands of opinions is not worth as much as one tiny spark of reason in an individual man." Galileo Galilei
The old science that brought us to where we are now was heavily influenced by the idea that whatever came out of it was irrelevant of someones feelings or political influences, it was an eureka moment or something that god wanted us to see or the want to find out something outside personal benefit as a reasoning.
Now its money makes the world go round.