Telford Muslim Grooming Gangs

Joined
Mar 10, 2018
Messages
463
Likes
637
Points
93
#37
No, they redifined all forms of Corporal Punishment as abuse, then they defined abuse as sexual. Corporal punishment is now abuse. It's all about perception. The Catholic Church now has six gorrilan victims.
They were sick animals who will never again hold power or influence over the people of Ireland.


What is happening in England is sad for all those young people and their families but here in Ireland we should be look across the pond and see what is happening as a firm reason to have a limit on who comes into the country and obviously that they have the correct skill sets to make a positive difference.

I wouldn't worry to much about England as a nation which went out to conquer and control the world now overrun and ruled by the former slaves is a fitting end to them.
 
Joined
Jan 11, 2018
Messages
1,849
Likes
1,958
Points
163
#38
They were sick animals who will never again hold power or influence over the people of Ireland.


What is happening in England is sad for all those young people and their families but here in Ireland we should be look across the pond and see what is happening as a firm reason to have a limit on who comes into the country and obviously that they have the correct skill sets to make a positive difference.

I wouldn't worry to much about England as a nation which went out to conquer and control the world now overrun and ruled by the former slaves is a fitting end to them.
They were sick animals who will never again hold power or influence over the people of Ireland.


What is happening in England is sad for all those young people and their families but here in Ireland we should be look across the pond and see what is happening as a firm reason to have a limit on who comes into the country and obviously that they have the correct skill sets to make a positive difference.

I wouldn't worry to much about England as a nation which went out to conquer and control the world now overrun and ruled by the former slaves is a fitting end to them.
How can I get through to these keeds?
 

Superhans

Site Admin
Staff member
Site Admin
Donator
Premium Account
Joined
Oct 30, 2015
Messages
2,622
Likes
3,327
Points
213
#39
where is the media ? why is this not main news? you are talking about 10 000s young English girls that have being raped, beating, drugged, impregnated and even murdered by these Asian gangs.

it's deeply worrying, that the media have turned a blind eye to this. what's it going to be like when they outnumber us? in the under 40 category in the UK that's just 20 years away.
Its of no surprise that the Russian stuff comes out at the same time this does.
 
Joined
Jan 6, 2017
Messages
532
Likes
1,144
Points
143
#42
This doesn't seem to gotten any coverage in the Irish Times or Independent.
They cover individual cases of rape and sexual assault in the UK though.
I think this gives us a good indication of how they will approach the subject when it happens here.
 

Myles O'Reilly

Donator
Premium Account
Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
5,862
Likes
5,143
Points
313
Location
Ireland
#43
They did say Rotherham was the tip of the iceberg. This is the English answer to the Catholic Church with a lot more victims.
I thought they already had their answer to the Catholic Church with Jimmy Saville, Prime Ministers and right the way up to the Royals with their official paedo ring?
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2017
Messages
1,355
Likes
1,932
Points
163
#44
The word pedophile has no meaing in a society where consent has no meaning outside of marraige. This is the result of importing pakistannis who do not have a concept of the word into a society that does but is hamstringed by cultrual relativism and cuckoldry.
Dangerous Immigration – Pakistani Migrant Tells Court He "Didn’t Understand" Pedophilia Was Illegal
Rampant Pedophilia in Pakistani Madrassas

Age of consent - Wikipedia
A general shift in social and legal attitudes toward issues of sex occurred during the modern era. Attitudes on the appropriate age of permission for females to engage in sexual activity drifted toward adulthood. While ages from ten to thirteen years were typically regarded as acceptable ages for sexual consent in Western countries during the mid-19th century,[1] by the end of the 19th century changing attitudes towards sexuality and childhood resulted in the raising of the age of consent.[5]

Several articles written by investigative journalist William Thomas Stead in the late 19th century on the issue of child prostitution in London led to public outrage and ultimately to the raising of the age of consent to sixteen.
English common law had traditionally set the age of consent within the range of ten to twelve years old, but the Offences Against the Person Act 1875 raised this to thirteen in Great Britain and Ireland. Early feminists of the Social Purity movement, such as Josephine Butler and others, instrumental in securing the repeal of the Contagious Diseases Acts, began to turn towards the problem of child prostitution by the end of the 1870s. Sensational media revelations about the scourge of child prostitution in London in the 1880s then caused outrage among the respectable middle-classes, leading to pressure for the age of consent to be raised again.

The investigative journalist William Thomas Stead of the Pall Mall Gazette was pivotal in exposing the problem of child prostitution in the London underworld through a publicity stunt. In 1885 he "purchased" one victim, Eliza Armstrong, the thirteen-year-old daughter of a chimney sweep, for five pounds and took her to a brothel where she was drugged. He then published a series of four exposés entitled The Maiden Tribute of Modern Babylon, which shocked its readers with tales of child prostitution and the abduction, procurement, and sale of young English virgins to Continental "pleasure palaces". The "Maiden Tribute" was an instant sensation with the reading public, and Victorian society was thrown into an uproar about prostitution. Fearing riots on a national scale, the Home Secretary, Sir William Harcourt, pleaded in vain with Stead to cease publication of the articles. A wide variety of reform groups held protest meetings and marched together to Hyde Park demanding that the age of consent be raised. The government was forced to propose the Criminal Law Amendment Act 1885, which raised the age of consent from thirteen to sixteen and clamped down on prostitution.[9]

In the United States, as late as the 1880s most states set the minimum age at ten to twelve (in Delaware, it was seven in 1895).[10] Inspired by the "Maiden Tribute" articles, female reformers in the U.S. initiated their own campaign,[11] which petitioned legislators to raise the legal minimum age to at least sixteen, with the ultimate goal to raise the age to eighteen. The campaign was successful, with almost all states raising the minimum age to sixteen to eighteen years by 1920.[5][12]

In France, Portugal, Denmark, the Swiss cantons and other countries, the minimum age was raised to between thirteen and sixteen years in the following decades.[5] Though the original arguments for raising the age of consent were based on morality, since then the raison d'être of the laws has changed to child welfare and a so-called right to childhood or innocence.[13]

In France, under the Napoleonic Code, the age of consent was set in 1832 at eleven,[14] and was raised to thirteen in 1863.[15] It was increased to fifteen in 1945.[16]

In Spain, it was set in 1822 at "puberty age", and changed to twelve in 1870,[17] which was kept until 1999, when it became 13;[18][19] and in 2015 it was raised to 16.[20][21][22]
The west has already been through this before, the age of consent was continually raised over time to the defaults we have now, and around the world through western pressure.

British Feminists Role in the Reform of Age of Consent Laws in Colonial India | History of Feminism
One of the legal reforms in India that most clearly followed upon the efforts of British reformers was “age of consent” law—law governing the age at which adolescents can legally consent to sexual intercourse. Nineteenth century age of consent laws in England and India arose in the context of prostitution and child marriage, respectively, which were social issues directly linked to Victorian notions of domesticity and sexual restraint. The different cultural contexts, however, show how a concept as simple as age of consent takes on multiple meanings when different groups are vying for control over sexuality and for the power to define the appropriate contours of the family.
In England, prostitution threatened the sanctity of the middle-class home and the Victorian wife’s hold on reproduction. In India, the child-bride, an upper-caste phenomenon, brought colonial norms of sexual restraint and family structure into conflict with native claims over the right to define the private realm of the family. In the end, however, British women cared most about age of consent, because both prostitution and the child-bride threatened their power to define the parameters of sexual access.
In the summer of 1885, William T. Stead of the Pall Mall Gazette published an exposé on the foreign trafficking of women and the entrapment of children into prostitution—one of the most successful pieces of scandal
journalism published in nineteenth century Britain. In The Maiden Tribute of Modern Babylon, Snead recounted the purchase, for five pounds, of young rural virgins for sale to satisfy the lusts of the decadent aristocratic class.
...
From the perspective of the colonial rulers, interference in Indian family and religious principles was to be avoided so long as those principles did not enrage the British public, as sati, child-brides, and polygamy did. They also did not want widows or single women falling on the welfare of the parish or the state because women generally were to be under the dominion of a man. So, as far as the colonial rulers were concerned, they had little to gain and much to lose by interfering too much in the Indian family and marriage. Similarly, native elites had much to gain by retaining control over the Indian family and marriage, particularly by retaining control over women’s sexuality and property. Between these two groups of men, therefore, there was little incentive to upset the cultural norms, and it is not surprising, therefore, that it took another forty years before child marriages were outlawed.
British feminists, on the other hand, were deeply concerned about the infection of the British family from diseased prostitutes and sexual promiscuity, controlled in part by the Contagious Diseases Acts and age of consent laws. In order to maintain their own domestic control and status as moral superiors, they needed to enforce Victorian norms of the nuclear family and sexual restraint.
They focused on the prostitute at home because it was the prostitute who infected their husbands, who then brought the disease into the sanctity of their English homes. The threat of venereal disease was a constant image in the feminist press of the Victorian period.

In India, however, the threat of sexual perversity pervaded marriage itself and gave rise to fears that male expectations about pedophilia and rape would make their way northward to threaten British marriages. The feminists focused in Britain on prostitution and in India on marriages because both threatened the Victorian marriage at home. While neither English men nor Indian men felt a great incentive to interfere with the regulation and examination of prostitutes under the Contagious Diseases Acts, the age of consent for sexual intercourse, or the age of marriage, these laws all threatened to weaken British women’s control over the family sphere and the moral boundaries of sexual behavior by infiltrating the sanctity of the British home.

Again if the british want to fix their issues of integration and cultural enrichment, they just need to do what they have done before like Charles James Napier - Wikipedia
Napier opposed suttee, or sati. This was the custom of burning a widow alive on the funeral pyre of her husband. Sati was rare in Sindh during the time Napier stayed in this region.[13] Napier judged that the immolation was motivated by profits for the priests, and when told of an actual Sati about to take place, he informed those involved that he would stop the sacrifice. The priests complained to him that this was a customary religious rite, and that customs of a nation should be respected. As recounted by his brother William, he replied:
"Be it so. This burning of widows is your custom; prepare the funeral pile. But my nation has also a custom. When men burn women alive we hang them, and confiscate all their property. My carpenters shall therefore erect gibbets on which to hang all concerned when the widow is consumed. Let us all act according to national customs." [13]
A society over time will deem certain practices to be degenerate and so have dogmas/stigmas attached to them and make laws to stop these practices for the minority that ignores the dogma/stigmas.
We have gone from have been ruled by a minority, who align themselves with other minorities (like the priesthood) within the same ingroup over the majority, to being run by traitors to there own ingroup and a new set of minorities to rule over the majority which include those from what were previously considered degenerate practices and from different cultures (foreign imports), and so cultural relativism is an necessary norm to protect their new allies (this is why nationalism is a good thing, at least your own ingroup is less likely to want to replace you as well).
So now these laws no longer apply to these minorities, as they have been removed or dont apply specifically to them now that they are a protected group.

Words like pedophile may have no meaning for certain people with specific predilections, allow your priests (who were a previous minority group held above the law) to become infested with queers and then become lapse and less militant about the ways of the priesthood and you end up with lots of altar boys, teenage or otherwise getting raped, as certain types more likely to see a hole as a hole.
The question around ted heath was how young the boys that he rode where. Why would he care if theres grass on the opposite end of the field, and as the stigmas around his default aggressive sexual behavior is been removed due to his position of power (no doubt why he was given that position as he could be controlled, though now these stigmas have been removed in many ways today), you have even less chance of them caring about an arbitrary thing like age.
And with the asian gang epidemic, such words dont have any meaning in the first place, they are alien concepts to them and so ignored.

A sick society will breed sick behaviour, but any one group of people will have a different concept of what sick behaviour is. The more people you import that hold different ideas of what is right and wrong, the more this abnormal behviour will manifest itself. You import enough people and everything will be come norm.

The men of the west are weak, cuckolded and gilded. Look at this shit ffs, these are the people whose job it is to protect the public. At the same time these cattle would be against gun ownership, where you could at least protect yourself and family.
Go rewatch Demolition man, the west is mirroring it, just with more wesley snipes characters and less stalones.

And now 'Hear no evil, speak no evil, see no evil' (in the western sense, not the dont dwell on evil thoughts) is becoming the norm.
I can talk shit about the chinese with the indians (they will start the shit talk about them not me), i can talk shit about the Japanese with the koreans etc.. and vice versa.
But I cannot do the same when surrounded by my own people without fear of those same people try and destroy me, we are living in a society that is seeking its own death. So im now finding i spend more time conversing with the foreigners then i do with the irish.

Of course we have more 1984 going on in the west
Welcome to 2018, the Year of Censored Social Media - Bloomberg

And lets not forget the ever encroaching brave new world.
Oxytocin-enforced norm compliance reduces xenophobic outgroup rejection. - PubMed - NCBI Oxytocin-enforced norm compliance reduces xenophobic outgroup rejection.


As an aside, we need to stop screaming at each other, either find a common understanding, or ignore them.
The twitter, social media and its memes is where the battle over the general mind is won or lost, as too many people live in a bubble and only see the world through their phone eg. not yet living in a no go area where there kids are being raped or are scared of getting mugged walking to the shop.

This country knows what it was like to be run by people who wanted us dead, the old british empire tried may times to cull the herd.
They have now succumbed to the same filth that we are being taken over by, globalists and their cuck/degenerate allies.
We should know better then to allow history to repeat itself. I dont think there will be a another chance at it.
 

Myles O'Reilly

Donator
Premium Account
Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
5,862
Likes
5,143
Points
313
Location
Ireland
#45
I think this gives us a good indication of how they will approach the subject when it happens here.
And it will happen here. Its a mathematical certainty.

And when it does, all the protestations of innocence from the Snowflakes and Islam lovers like Mr Max Flynn will be in vain. They were well warned and chose not to heed that warning.

It suddenly just occurred to me that although Max Flynn sounds like a nice guy he's actually my mortal enemy.
 

TheWexfordInn

Donator
Premium Account
Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2015
Messages
2,596
Likes
2,829
Points
213
#46
And it will happen here. Its a mathematical certainty.

And when it does, all the protestations of innocence from the Snowflakes and Islam lovers like Mr Max Flynn will be in vain. They were well warned and chose not to heed that warning.

It suddenly just occurred to me that although Max Flynn sounds like a nice guy he's actually my mortal enemy.
Thats my thinking as well. I can understand the "Normies" who oppose people speaking out against the Islamic takeover of Europe because basically they have never really thought about it and are just parroting the "correct" views instilled by the main stream media.
Its people who have thought about it and who are still campaigning against those pushing back against the Islamic invasion who are our real enemies.
 

Myles O'Reilly

Donator
Premium Account
Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
5,862
Likes
5,143
Points
313
Location
Ireland
#47
Early feminists such as Josephine Butler and others began to turn towards the problem of child prostitution by the end of the 1870s. .
Back when feminists were actually, you know, feminists.

The modern gang of whores had a march in London during the week - for what nobody knows - the same time another huge child prostitution scandal was unearthed in Telford and there wasn't so much as a peep out of them over it.
 
Top Bottom