Jordan Peterson pulled up on Solzhenitsyn's views on the Jewish Question.

Joined
Jan 22, 2018
Messages
673
Likes
296
Points
63
Location
Dublin
#25
The people of the Jewish race, being of foreign extraction, first of all do not belong on the island of Ireland, but also tend to lean toward detrimental political views. They have tended to be against any form of aristocratic rule in Occidental civilisation. In Finance, they have traditionally committed usury on a grand scale and tend to get a stranglehold on the financial sectors of the countries which are the least anti-Jewish, for instance the United States of America. Not to mention that Jews literally refer to us as Goyim in their religious texts, which is probably the reason Martin Luther wrote On the Jews and their Lies.

If it only rested on the fact that the presence of Jews tends to lead to a more "progressive" society, then that would be enough, but as it is there is something deeply sinister about their race, indeed highly detrimental to the prosperity of the Irish nation-state.
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2016
Messages
358
Likes
366
Points
63
#26
I don't believe in "Elders of the Protocols of Zion" type Jewish conspiracies. I'm probably outside of Dan the only person on this forum who has actually got to know Jews on a real life basis, in general I like them, however for good or for bad they are incredibly tribal and more so than Ulster Scots who are the most tribal indigenous group on these Isles outside of Travellers. Plus in terms of Jewish Liberalism there is often an incredible lack of consistency on this issue- roc_ is a prime example of this. Jews who are genuinely "Liberal" incline towards lula stuff such as Trotskyism or Anarchism. One thing I will say is that all the anti-Semites I have known tended to have either strong typically Jewish vices or virtues or a combination of both. Farrakhan is a prime example of this- and I actually find him over all an impressive figure.
I lived among them in Israel for a while and yes individually some are sound but at the end of the day they know what team their on whereas most Goys don't even realize there's a game on. This video just came out featuring the SPLC at 3 minutes 10 she admits to an "Elders of the Protocols of Zion" type conspiracy. They hate us and want us gone.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 31, 2017
Messages
1,676
Likes
696
Points
113
Location
Dublin
#27
The people of the Jewish race, being of foreign extraction, first of all do not belong on the island of Ireland, but also tend to lean toward detrimental political views.
Depends on how you define "detrimental".
They certainly lean towards cosmopolitanism, which is to be expected from an affluent, mainly urban ethnicity.
But they're hardly unique in this respect.
They have tended to be against any form of aristocratic rule in Occidental civilisation. In Finance, they have traditionally committed usury on a grand scale and tend to get a stranglehold on the financial sectors of the countries which are the least anti-Jewish, for instance the United States of America. Not to mention that Jews literally refer to us as Goyim in their religious texts, which is probably the reason Martin Luther wrote On the Jews and their Lies.
They were often the trusted advisers of the aristocracy.
They dominated finance because of the moronic Christian prohibition on usury.
Interest rates coordinate investment, without which a functioning economy is impossible.

And Goyim means "nations". What's so objectionable about that?

If it only rested on the fact that the presence of Jews tends to lead to a more "progressive" society, then that would be enough, but as it is there is something deeply sinister about their race, indeed highly detrimental to the prosperity of the Irish nation-state.
Highly intelligent and with well honed networking skills.
I'd hardly call it 'sinister', although it has invited the occasional bit of green eyed leering from less accomplished groups.

Jews Constitute/constituted of series of nodal links that greatly assisted diplomacy across the West.
Historically, well connected Jews in other nations served as a first port of call in international outreach.
Jewish diplomats involved in negotiations -- whether to avoid war, build alliances, establish trade relations etc -- acted as bridges between nations.

Of course, all this is overlooked by rabid Jew haters.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 31, 2015
Messages
2,211
Likes
4,039
Points
213
#28
Whatever about the intelligence of Peterson, that audience was downright infantile and moronic.
Shouts of "Shut him down" when the question was being posed.
And then the pantomine mob reaction as Peterson pondered on the reply.
You'd imagine that he would attract a viewer of a curious mind.
 
Joined
Jan 22, 2018
Messages
673
Likes
296
Points
63
Location
Dublin
#29
Depends on how you define "detrimental".
They dominated finance because of the moronic Christian prohibition on usury.
Interest rates coordinate investment, without which a functioning economy is impossible.
My definition of detrimental political views are any that defend a false idea of progress- Liberal and Socialist ideologies.

Unreasonably high interest rates that make it difficult for the people of Ireland to protect their wealth is a negative aspect of usury, indeed the interest rates that lead to a thriving economy are useless if that economy lies in the hands of a foreign race. That being said, I am not against the complete and utter absence of profit within the banking world, but the Jewish race should be excluded from participating in Ireland.

Aside from all of this, they are racially incompatible with the Irish and should not be here.

Why do you think so many have objected to the presence of Jews within the Occidental nation-states?
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2017
Messages
1,676
Likes
696
Points
113
Location
Dublin
#30
My definition of detrimental political views are any that defend a false idea of progress- Liberal and Socialist ideologies.

What exactly is this supposed to mean?

The concept of "progress" is subjective, yet it's a notion that can't be dispensed with.
Even your utopian, "neo-reactionary" hogwash could be construed as such, in that it's a desired end state you'd like to see society progress towards.

Unreasonably high interest rates that make it difficult for the people of Ireland to protect their wealth is a negative aspect of usury, indeed the interest rates that lead to a thriving economy are useless if that economy lies in the hands of a foreign race. That being said, I am not against the complete and utter absence of profit within the banking world, but the Jewish race should be excluded from participating in Ireland.

Aside from all of this, they are racially incompatible with the Irish and should not be here.
High interest rates aren't the main problem with our economy: interest rates being kept artificially low by central banks are.
This is what fuels the dramatic bust boom cycles.
If interest rates were allowed to naturally adjust, people couldn't over extend themselves with debt in the first place.

Why do you think so many have objected to the presence of Jews within the Occidental nation-states?
There was likely a lot of suspicion due to the highly ethnocentric nature of Jews.
But religious superstition and envy likely also played a role.
 
Joined
Jan 22, 2018
Messages
673
Likes
296
Points
63
Location
Dublin
#31
it's a desired end state you'd like to see society progress towards.

There was likely a lot of suspicion due to the highly ethnocentric nature of Jews.
Reaction is the opposition to the false idea of progress within Liberal and Socialist ideology. It is a reversal of these "progressive" elements. You have made it in to a semantic problem when it needn't be. People of the Jewish race tend to support these "progressive" elements within politics, such that it can even be said that the presence of Jews in a country can cause this.

Aside from being racially incompatible, as you say the Jews do not even want to assimilate- so why should we tolerate them?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 31, 2017
Messages
1,676
Likes
696
Points
113
Location
Dublin
#32
Reaction is the opposition to progress. It is a reversal of progressive elements. You have made it in to a semantic problem when it needn't be. People of the Jewish race tend to support progressive elements within politics, such that it can even be said that the presence of Jews in a country can cause this.

Aside from being racially incompatible, as you say the Jews do not even want to assimilate- so why should we tolerate them?
To what point in history would you like to move back the clock?
Even if you did decide on a past era to emulate, all it would amount to is little more than an exercise in rosy-retropective self indulgence.
We know very little about the past, save a few cherry picked narratives here and there.

And like everything else in nature, societies evolve over time.

As for Jews, they've been a presence in the West for a very long time.
If you're worried about various groups subverting the state, the solution is to decentralise political power.
 
Joined
Jan 22, 2018
Messages
673
Likes
296
Points
63
Location
Dublin
#33
To what point in history would you like to move back the clock?
A variation on Griffith's plan for an Irish monarchy under the inspiration of figures like Brian Boru, but not an emulation of a system that far in the past, emulating to some extent the British system but without a British monarch, under a system of aristocracy and peasantry [as much as this is still possible], non-democratic, in so far as the parliament serves as one party which is Monarchist and other political ideologies are considered detrimental and therefore banned.

Essentially England before it became overly Liberal might be the closest thing to what I am referring to. Parliament should exist as a means of specialists working toward the prosperity of the island of Ireland but in full allegiance to the monarch and for this reason there should essentially be no diversity in politics.
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2017
Messages
1,676
Likes
696
Points
113
Location
Dublin
#34
A variation on Griffith's plan for an Irish monarchy under the inspiration of figures like Brian Boru, but not an emulation of a system that far in the past, emulating to some extent the British system but without a British monarch, under a system of aristocracy and peasantry [as much as this is still possible], non-democratic, in so far as the parliament serves as one party which is Monarchist and other political ideologies are considered detrimental and therefore banned.

Essentially England before it became overly Liberal might be the closest thing to what I am referring to. Parliament should exist as a means of specialists working toward the prosperity of the island of Ireland but in full allegiance to the monarch and for this reason there should essentially be no diversity in politics.
But the institutions you'd like to see emulated emerged in the context of a very different society.
Aristocracy and peasantry, for example, were a pre-industrial social phenomena, a division of labour that made sense in an agricultural economy.
And when I said that we know very little about previous eras, I meant the recent as well as the distant past.

At best, the history books give us a 2-D, skeletal collage of partially verified facts, haphazardly woven into a readable narrative by historians -- "failed novelists" as H.L Mencken called them.


Questionably strewn together historical narratives can never capture the immense complexity and richness of past societies; never mind serving as a guide for reconstructing a society.
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2017
Messages
1,676
Likes
696
Points
113
Location
Dublin
#36
We still have the political writings of past figures.
We do indeed.
Many of which were just as utopian and unworkable back then as they are now.

It's hubris of the most absurd kind for an individual, or group of individuals, to think they can re-organise society from the top down.
This applies equally to leftwing as well as rightwing utopianists.

You can't centrally plan a society any more than you can a language.