Welcome to Political Irish

We believe in free legal speech, fair play and good discussion. Sign up and join in!

Register Log in
  • Before posting anything about the COVID-19 virus, please read this first Click Here

How will you vote on the Blasphemy Referendum?

How will you vote on the Blasphemy Referendum?

  • Tá / Yes - to change the Constitution

    Votes: 15 32.6%
  • Níl / No - To keep the current Constitution

    Votes: 23 50.0%
  • Cant Vote/Wont Vote

    Votes: 7 15.2%
  • Spoilt Ballot

    Votes: 1 2.2%

  • Total voters
    46
  • Poll closed .

Una

Donator
PI Member
Joined
May 12, 2017
Messages
3,571
Likes
5,004
Location
Dublin
Are you concerned that the Musloid Fundies will abuse the blasphemy laws to further their wicked and evil ideology?

They're far more protected via the new Hate Speech laws in the UK, because they're more far reaching. & include social media. etc.
That's why the FG/FF traitors want access to The Constitution.
 

Una

Donator
PI Member
Joined
May 12, 2017
Messages
3,571
Likes
5,004
Location
Dublin
I cannot see them ever wanting to get rid of something that allows criticism of islam
So it is suspicious they are wanting to get rid of blasphemy

However you are saying that even if they we KEEP it, that the "seditious and distressing language parts will still be there as they are now.

So how isn't that impacting us now, while getting rid of a word that protects islam, Christianity has already been near demolished in the country, the law is not protecting us a whit.
Absolutely, they are leaving IN Seditious.
Seditious': inciting people to rebel, or use language against the authority of a state.


(but after the Referendum, they will Elaborate) with further accompanying legislation, that they alone with draft & control.

To do this, they must FIRST Access 'The Constitution'.
They can only do this via 'A Referendum'.
It currently protects All religions, not just Islam, but the Hate Speech Laws would protect Islam way more than Blasphemy, while we would have removed another word, having consequences 4 'Christianity' as well ! (which aids them further in removing God from the Constitution).
but they will still get their Hate Speech legislation.. & include social media, & any Resistance to migration into IRL.
The UN removing Borders is an example.
UN Migration Compact expected to say migration is a “human right”
 

Atlantean Irish

PI Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2017
Messages
3,950
Likes
4,868
Location
Atlantis
Keeping it won't aid Islam. This is a carrot they shoved into the media to convince the masses to remove it.
The more recent Hate Speech laws introduced in the UK aided Islam more, because they were Much more Far reaching..... in that you can now arrest someone for a tweet.
They can add, new accompanying legislation thru a Referendum, via The Constitution.
As I have been asking - what is stopping them from making such laws now in addition to blasphemy law - nobody has been able to answer this yet.

Keeping it DOES aid Islam, we have already seen how ridicule and insult of Christ and Christians is allowed in Ireland but same is not allowed for Islam, already now. This law has not been put into practice properly because it has not been tested by mass-immigration and the changing demographic.
Comparing recent UK hatespeech laws in UK is invalid - as they are recent and designed specifically for multicult - but this irish law already has the other aspects like sedition and distressing language.
What is stopping them adding new legislation even if this law stays?
 

Atlantean Irish

PI Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2017
Messages
3,950
Likes
4,868
Location
Atlantis
Absolutely, they are leaving IN Seditious.
Seditious': inciting people to rebel, or use language against the authority of a state.


(but after the Referendum, they will Elaborate) with further accompanying legislation, that they alone with draft & control.

To do this, they must FIRST Access 'The Constitution'.
They can only do this via 'A Referendum'.
It currently protects All religions, not just Islam, but the Hate Speech Laws would protect Islam way more than Blasphemy, while we would have removed another word, having consequences 4 'Christianity' as well ! (which aids them further in removing God from the Constitution).
but they will still get their Hate Speech legislation.. & include social media, & any Resistance to migration into IRL.
The UN removing Borders is an example.
UN Migration Compact expected to say migration is a “human right”
But you are saying what they are leaving in i.e - those things are ALREADY there - so those items are there to be used as it stands now.
 

Atlantean Irish

PI Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2017
Messages
3,950
Likes
4,868
Location
Atlantis
If in doubt and there is a lot - instinct would dictate that whatever globalists are gushing about - do opposite.
 

Atlantean Irish

PI Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2017
Messages
3,950
Likes
4,868
Location
Atlantis
Because as a Republic, where The Constitution belongs to the People of Ireland, & where God, The Individual, & The Constitution comes First,
before Majority /Mob rule, Corporations, or a Monarch, they have to get Access The Constitution to bring in accompanying legislative changes............................
They Can ONLY bring in those legislative changes via a Referendum.
This is the problem for the Globalists.
IRELAND HAS a ROCK SOLID Constitution that PROTECTS the Individual & the People of Ireland.
Removing one word, like Blasphemy, allows them to elborate, with further Accompanying legislation, that the public will NOT Draft, & NOT have access to.
They will then pass it in the Dail.
Without our input.
Proposals for amendments to change the constitution can be made any time. When both houses pass such a proposal (amendment) then it is called a referendum when voted on by the electorate. But amendments can be made any time.

What I am talking about - is a completely new bill or law - what is stopping them making a completely new law or even amending the Incitement to hatred 1989 law? Which will have nothing to do with blasphemy law even if kept?
 

Una

Donator
PI Member
Joined
May 12, 2017
Messages
3,571
Likes
5,004
Location
Dublin
As I have been asking - what is stopping them from making such laws now in addition to blasphemy law - nobody has been able to answer this yet.

Keeping it DOES aid Islam, we have already seen how ridicule and insult of Christ and Christians is allowed in Ireland but same is not allowed for Islam, already now. This law has not been put into practice properly because it has not been tested by mass-immigration and the changing demographic.
Comparing recent UK hatespeech laws in UK is invalid - as they are recent and designed specifically for multicult - but this irish law already has the other aspects like sedition and distressing language.
What is stopping them adding new legislation even if this law stays?

but the UK is Not a Republic.... & does not have A Constitution. So they can bring in Hate Speech laws a lot easier......................
But in IRL, The Irish Constitution is stopping them, so to bring in accompanying hate speech laws that they would ADD to Seditious, they first have to Hack into the Constitution.
Anything that affects 'The Individual' can only be accessed via The Constitution.
Otherwise they would of brought in the Hate Speech Laws already !
The people are not going to insult Islam 'the religion' itself, because of mass migration,....it wouldn't achieve anything.
It's the mass migration itself that's the problem.
 

Atlantean Irish

PI Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2017
Messages
3,950
Likes
4,868
Location
Atlantis
but the UK is Not a Republic.... & does not have A Constitution. So they can bring in Hate Speech laws a lot easier......................
But in IRL, The Irish Constitution is stopping them, so to bring in accompanying hate speech laws that they would ADD to Seditious, they first have to Hack into the Constitution.
Anything that affects 'The Individual' can only be accessed via The Constitution.
Otherwise they would of brought in the Hate Speech Laws already !
The people are not going to insult Islam 'the religion' itself, because of mass migration,....it wouldn't achieve anything.
It's the mass migration itself that's the problem.
The Additional legislation that they Alone would control would probably include social media.
They cannot make these additions Without accessing The Constitution.
Because we had real Patriots who made it Rock Solid. to protect us. For this very reason.
Laws can be made in Ireland anytime as explained. Amendments are proposed at any time. Amendments ARE the proposals, that are the changes to the constitution.
Any hatespeech amendment or even new law can be made over and above the blasphemy law at any time.

They have not brought in "hatespeech" laws already because in Ireland things move very slowly and there have been changes in gov, and other referenda etc ongoing. Things are done under the radar as much as possible - they got their invasion without waking the people, they did not want to wake the people with anything that would sound like oppressing them, hence no movement on this until they knew time was right - abortion ref, signalled time was right to them.
Social media is already included in any hatespeech laws in Ireland under "electronic means"
I am not talking about insulting islam - I am talking about being able to speak facts about Mohammad being a paedo, which is taken as an insult in islam, also drawing Mohammad with a face is taken as an insult. But ridicule is also part of attacking a religion, depending on the religion, and it is Western right to ridicule religion or anything - we see what happened in Holland and France when people simply criticised islam with ridicule
It is our right and critical to freespeech to be able to ridicule anything.
This is the main concern I have with keeping this law - Islam will find a way to cement it to their own benefit.
 

Una

Donator
PI Member
Joined
May 12, 2017
Messages
3,571
Likes
5,004
Location
Dublin
Proposals for amendments to change the constitution can be made any time. When both houses pass such a proposal (amendment) then it is called a referendum when voted on by the electorate. But amendments can be made any time.

What I am talking about - is a completely new bill or law - what is stopping them making a completely new law or even amending the Incitement to hatred 1989 law? Which will have nothing to do with blasphemy law even if kept?
because to make a new law, they would have to access the Constitution again, & Elaborate via accompanying legislation following on from Seditious... Bacik was on Prime Time & admitted she would add Hate Speech Laws after the Referendum, which she knows will pass because they have misled the public, & they're not going to miss their chance to shut everyone up in their advancing plans.
It will probably pass, & then we'll see Bacik & Amnesty rushing down to the Senate to draft in their new proposals for Hate Speech.
 

Una

Donator
PI Member
Joined
May 12, 2017
Messages
3,571
Likes
5,004
Location
Dublin
Laws can be made in Ireland anytime as explained. Amendments are proposed at any time. Amendments ARE the proposals, that are the changes to the constitution.
Any hatespeech amendment or even new law can be made over and above the blasphemy law at any time.

They have not brought in "hatespeech" laws already because in Ireland things move very slowly and there have been changes in gov, and other referenda etc ongoing. Things are done under the radar as much as possible - they got their invasion without waking the people, they did not want to wake the people with anything that would sound like oppressing them, hence no movement on this until they knew time was right - abortion ref, signalled time was right to them.
Social media is already included in any hatespeech laws in Ireland under "electronic means"
I am not talking about insulting islam - I am talking about being able to speak facts about Mohammad being a paedo, which is taken as an insult in islam, also drawing Mohammad with a face is taken as an insult. But ridicule is also part of attacking a religion, depending on the religion, and it is Western right to ridicule religion or anything - we see what happened in Holland and France when people simply criticised islam with ridicule
It is our right and critical to freespeech to be able to ridicule anything.
This is the main concern I have with keeping this law - Islam will find a way to cement it to their own benefit.
well i think they're leading us down a garden path, & have ulterior motives.... With the abortion Referendum, the accompanying legislation they wrote gave them complete control of the legislative outcome. Our vote was the green light, & they Rigged that to make sure they got a 'large mandate', to give themselves even further freedom in the drafting of the legislation, & we have no control.
 

Atlantean Irish

PI Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2017
Messages
3,950
Likes
4,868
Location
Atlantis
because to make a new law, they would have to access the Constitution again, & Elaborate via accompanying legislation following on from Seditious... Bacik was on Prime Time & admitted she would add Hate Speech Laws after the Referendum, which she knows will pass because they have misled the public, & they're not going to miss their chance to shut everyone up in their advancing plans.
It will probably pass, & then we'll see Bacik & Amnesty rushing down to the Senate to draft in their new proposals for Hate Speech.
New laws can be made anytime.
Amendments which are what are the proposals to the constitution, can be made at anytime.

Ok, I have answered somewhat my own query.
It is clear now, that they could make any amendment at any time, and what is being done here, is to make sure they get the rubber stamp of a YES vote, in order to guarantee with least amount of being rejected, laws being promoted as just to do with blasphemy - even though they could bring in any laws at any time, it is better to do it, when you spike the people into thinking they are voting for something modern with the potential to counter islam.
 

The Potato Mystic

PI Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2016
Messages
8,610
Likes
14,728
but the UK is Not a Republic.... & does not have A Constitution. So they can bring in Hate Speech laws a lot easier......................
But in IRL, The Irish Constitution is stopping them, so to bring in accompanying hate speech laws that they would ADD to Seditious, they first have to Hack into the Constitution.
Anything that affects 'The Individual' can only be accessed via The Constitution.
Otherwise they would of brought in the Hate Speech Laws already !
The people are not going to insult Islam 'the religion' itself, because of mass migration,....it wouldn't achieve anything.
It's the mass migration itself that's the problem.
Sedition is all they need. I think the Constitution is very gap toothed when it comes to freedom of speech.

It's only the Americans that "do" freedom of speech. Europeans mouth it but can't really fathom it.

I don't see anything in this referendum bar one part of a broader anti-Christian kulturkamp and the regime trying to revel in the accolades of an easy referendum win.
 
Top Bottom