- Mar 17, 2016
I leaned towards that view before I understood what Dan's view was. Out of a set of implausible alternatives presented by various academics which are represented within the three general theories, some kind of directed energy process is the most convincing in light of the scale of destruction and the surrounding evidence. We can certainly discount the official narrative as something that can only believed by simpletons. But beyond that certitude as I've made clear before I don't fully know.So you continue to believe the claims made by Dan Og,
(a) that he holds a qualification in civil engineering
(b) that giant microwave/ laser beams destroyed the twin towers and created the dust.
You are well matched the two of ye