Gay Gay Gay, everywhere is GAY!

  • Thread starter Deleted member 917
  • Start date
  • Replies 514
  • Views 16K

Florence

PI Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2018
Messages
295
Likes
785

Mark Feehilly (WestLife) has just announced he and his male fiance are delighted to be 'dads' to a baby girl.

No mention of hiring a womb to faciltate this or which one is the biological father.

Or is either the biological father?

They could have bought sperm, bought an egg and hired a womb.

Or did the gay couple buy a newly born baby who mother did not really want it/couldn't afford it?
 
Last edited:

Esto Praesidium

PI Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2016
Messages
640
Likes
705

Mark Feehilly (West Life) has just announced he and his male fiance are delighted to be dads to a baby girl. No mention of hiring a womb to faciltate this or which one is the biological father. Or is either the biological father? They could have bought sperm, bought an egg and hired a womb. Or did the gay couple buy a newly born baby who mother did not really want it/couldn't afford it?
Third wave feminists love this of course, just like they love trannies winning women's wrestling.
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2017
Messages
2,357
Likes
3,480

Something wrong with these surveys, if its all under control then why is the infection rates going up, must not be surveying the immigrants, or people with it less likely to answer questions on it.


Depressing stuff. Thought pride was the ment to be the most serious of the deadly sins and yet is celebrated now from on high. Seems pride does come before a fall.
 

Sawdust

PI Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2019
Messages
1,489
Likes
1,938

Ted

PI Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2016
Messages
2,211
Likes
3,219

Mark Feehilly (WestLife) has just announced he and his male fiance are delighted to be 'dads' to a baby girl.

No mention of hiring a womb to faciltate this or which one is the biological father.

Or is either the biological father?

They could have bought sperm, bought an egg and hired a womb.

Or did the gay couple buy a newly born baby who mother did not really want it/couldn't afford it?
That child has a mother. What happened to her? Are we allowed ask?
 

GodsDog

Staff member
Moderator
PI Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2015
Messages
8,415
Likes
7,837
Location
Barkshire
Prolifers are vilified as forced-birthers with the refrain that women aren't 'vessels' or 'incubators', but somehow it's acceptable for poorer women to be exploited when it's rich gay men wanting a designer baby through surrogacy/IVF/ egg donation. What a f***ed up, hypocritical country this is now.
Most of the problem you are referring to here stems from capitalism and inequality not ideology.

The fact is rich fuckers, gay or otherwise, can mostly do what they like in this world.
Look at what Epstein or Weinstein got away with for decades.

Poor people by contrast always get the boot of the law shoved on their necks.
The rich get to exploit the poverty induced by capitalism and inequality
to get what they want from the disadvantaged and desperate, be it sex, their eggs or their
wombs, or their kidneys or their blood or the sweat of their brow as they toil as of units cheap labour.

Same goes for unwanted pregnancy.

To rich fuckers, it's just a minor inconvenience. Hop on a plane first class, check into an upmarket clinic and get well looked after
then maybe catch a west end show after you return to your nice hotel to make a weekend of it.

To the little teenage ballyfermot girl without a pot to piss in, who gets raped by the local low IQ violent neanderthal or some immigrant rapist,
this is a nightmare scenario where she may be forced to spend the rest of her young life minding the spawn of her rapist because she has no option.

So when it comes to capitalism, rich women are not incubators
but poor women may have no choice but to be, if they are to pay their bills
or if they cannot afford to pay the cost of the way out.
 
Top Bottom