I believe I am.I'm not sure you are correct.
Evidence?Afaik yes he does.
I think his big pal Chris Ferrara also does.
They were both among the first to analyse the problems of the alleged pontificate of Francis 1st.
Yet neither has managed to arrive at the conclusion that Benedicts resignation was and remains canonically flawed.
Ah, I see. You have conflated two entirely different ideas. You think that calling out Francis's heresy, while acknowledging his holding the office (for now) is somehow 'support'.I believe I am.
Neither Ferrara or Matt have publicly stated they think that Francis 1st is an antipope
Francis is a material heretic.Ah, I see. You have conflated two entirely different ideas. You think that calling out Francis's heresy, while acknowledging his holding the office (for now) is somehow 'support'.
No, it isn't. Two distinct and separate matters mixed up here by you.
I said it was my belief.None of this supports your claim that Matt or the Remnant 'support' Francis.
I'll keep it simple.Evidence for what?
If you are going to ask a question do so properly.
Very well said. We are unworthy of the Eucharist so taking it in the hand or on the tongue is not important to me. People should get off their high horses on this one.
Also, I was visiting London last month and was recommended to visit the Brompton Oratory. I did the next day and as luck would have it walked in on the Latin Mass with the famous choir. It was an amazing experience and I hope you get to visit there sometime old bean.
I have always in the past respected the chair of Saint Peter [I notice how you seek to de-sanctify him in the manner of all followers of antipopes] and i continue to respect that chair as currently occupied by the only lawfully elected living pope Benedict xvi.I'll keep it simple.
You base your tiresome opinion that Benedict's resignation and Francis' election are invalid on ..eh.. your opinion.
You reject, insult and deride the Chair of Peter in what must rate as the most childish piece of "reasoning" ever to blight these pages.
As you approach your twilight the pity is that you cannot see how laughable you've become.
You're a disgrace and would be laughed at in any open debate.I have always in the past respected the chair of Saint Peter [I notice how you seek to de-sanctify him in the manner of all followers of antipopes] and i continue to respect that chair as currently occupied by the only lawfully elected living pope Benedict xvi.
You were informed of the manner in which pope Benedict has erred in thinking he could bifurcate the papacy .
All Benedicts statements indicate he resigned the ministry but not the office of the papacy .
A resignation made in grave error is invalid per canon law 188.
Benedict has not manifested properly the supposed resignation as per canon 332 [no 2]
Benedict has for decades been considering this bizzare and thoroughly mistaken concept of active/passive papacy. He sprung it unannounced on the world and the dullard cardinals then held an invalid conclave without properly examining what Benedict was at.
All this is obvious to anybody who cares to look objectively at the matter.
But you are not objective and allow yourself to be completely deceived by the very idea of papacy itself as something incapable of error.