British Government surrender to Islam

Dan Óg

Ui Máine
Staff member
Donator
Premium Account
Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2015
Messages
10,123
Likes
4,677
Points
313
#14
YouGov | Only 2% of young men feel completely masculine (compared to 56% of over 65s)
Only 2% of young men feel completely masculine (compared to 56% of over 65s)

Younger generations of British people don't see themselves as completely masculine or feminine - and 'masculinity' tends to be seen as a negative word by young men

In other words the social engineering project has worked, they have successfully destroyed the roles of men and women in the west, destroying the underlined moral principles and familial structure.
They have created a generation of freaks, by breaking down boundaries/roles/rules. This is the end goal of the liberal agenda, narcissism, the worship of self, everyone is a special snowflake, and yet everyone is the same. We are all free to do what we want. In reality you are weak, useless and completely lost, easily taken advantage of and have no way to defend yourself, as the community that the strong family unit bolstered is dead. Perfect slaves to the corporate globalist system.

Except you cannot have freedoms without boundaries/roles/rules. The group that has boundaries/roles/rules will run you over, and take what they want.

You have a system which is in chaos as there is a vacuum and nature abhors a vacuum. This vacuum will be filled. Order will be restored, birth rate alone will take care of that, in this case the order will by sharia.
That is so true. It reflects the weakness of those promoting socialism versus the strength and self confidence of those promoting free enterprise.

Then the weak cry that the strong wish to live in a dog eat dog world
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2017
Messages
1,118
Likes
1,583
Points
163
#15
That is so true. It reflects the weakness of those promoting socialism versus the strength and self confidence of those promoting free enterprise.

Then the weak cry that the strong wish to live in a dog eat dog world
Why Liberalism Failed (Politics and Culture)
Of the three dominant ideologies of the twentieth century—fascism, communism, and liberalism—only the last remains.
This has created a peculiar situation in which liberalism’s proponents tend to forget that it is an ideology and not the natural end-state of human political evolution.

As Patrick Deneen argues in this provocative book, liberalism is built on a foundation of contradictions: it trumpets equal rights while fostering incomparable material inequality; its legitimacy rests on consent, yet it discourages civic commitments in favor of privatism; and in its pursuit of individual autonomy, it has given rise to the most far-reaching, comprehensive state system in human history.Here, Deneen offers an astringent warning that the centripetal forces now at work on our political culture are not superficial flaws but inherent features of a system whose success is generating its own failure.
...
America does not have a conservative and a liberal party. Rather, it has a right-liberal party, focused on free markets and free trade, and a left-liberal party, focused on social issues.
The United States, according to this view, has never had a “church and throne” conservative party such as those seen in many European countries.
...
Deneen notes that liberalism is one of the three great ideologies to dominate modern politics, along with communism and fascism. The latter two have been vanquished as serious competitors to liberalism, which had an advantage over them: “In contrast to its crueler competitor ideologies, liberalism is more insidious: as an ideology, it pretends to neutrality, claiming no preference and denying any intention of shaping the souls under its rule. It ingratiates by invitation to the easy liberties, diversions, and attractions of freedom, pleasure, and wealth.”
The two liberal parties in America compete by pointing to two seemingly opposed but factually reinforcing trends.

The right-liberal Republicans warn against the dominance of society by the state, while the left-liberal Democrats point to the tyranny of the market as the greatest threat to human freedom. Thus each party inspires its partisan members by fear of the threat the other party represents. But despite appearances, both parties, in fact, jointly work to expand both the state and the market.

As Deneen writes, “The insistent demand that we choose between protection of individual liberty and expansion of state activity masks the true relation between the state and market: that they grow constantly and necessarily together… modern liberalism proceeds by making us both more individualist and more statist.”


I havent read the above book yet, just seen it referenced a few times recently, and the phrase "it is an ideology and not the natural end-state of human political evolution" and general book ideas make sense to me.
The issue is liberalism is a death cult. Any ideology used as dogma is a religious cult, and the american model of church and state is one of liberalism and capitalism.

Within any church/state setup, no diffferent to any authoritarian system, real politics/populism cannot be allowed to exist. Vote banks are essential for this setup in the democratic model.
An example of the expansion of the state through unfettered liberalism is the emancipation of women, give them the vote and you see the state explode in size.
They will vote for the state as a replacement for the man/father/husband through protection by the police/laws etc.. or by financial security through free home/food/money etc...
Another example is blacks in america, but here the liberal system imposed the state on the black community, and created its vote bank.


As long as they vote democrat or republican, it doesnt matter. The welfare/warfare, socialise risk/privatise profit system will continue. Until the system caves in on itself due to the weakness of the men whose backs it was built on.

What comes out of this is either some Brazil 2.0, a mulatto mix of low class people without any upward mobility in an corporate technocracy chipped from head to toe OR we let the men of the East take over, as the men of the West are a bunch of fags.


The masculine western male was the primary opposition to liberalism. But so was family, roles, community, diverse cultures etc.. For any of this to work you need to continually remove/attack any opposition. And they use tools like feminism, political correctness, big state etc.. to fuck up the past norms that built the west that is.




As an aside, Ireland's political system is the same, we just vote on which side of the civil war our granddads fought on. The scum are all globalists. Ireland is just aping/larping/following what we see in America. The reason i had early hope with Trump, was it looked like politics/populism was making a return, but it looks more like a civil war going on within the deep state.

Its all a scam, and the primary goal is getting money for doing the least amount of effort necessary and stroke you ego while your at it.

Darwinism that is pushed by the scum at the top (dog eat dog), is just an excuse to justify themselves robbing the masses. Its so the scum can sleep better at night.
It also fools the plebs into thinking that this is normal, and just. Its a very important regarding updating the moral codes that want to impose.

Its horseshit, if it was true dog eat dog id spend my days finding all the traitors of this country, drag them out from their houses, and fill the ditch's the length of Ireland with their rotten corpses. The system is setup to promote the worst scum in society and then protect them when they get to the top while filling the voting booths with degenerates. Its a scam.
 
Top Bottom